ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of cemented bipolar femoral head arthroplasty in treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients combined with heart,lung,brain and other diseases.Methods The study comprised 23 cases,aged 75-86 years old,treated with cemented bipolar artificial femoral head arthroplasty between January 2005 and October 2013 (replacement group).Evans' classification of the fracture was type Ⅰ in 3 cases,type Ⅱ in 9,type Ⅲ a in 5,type Ⅲ b in 2,type Ⅳ in 3 and reverse intertrochanteric fracture in 1.Additionally,23 cases with the similar physical condition treated with anatomical locking plates were chosen as controls.For comparisons between groups,operation time,amount of bleeding,drainage volume,mean time to extract drainage tub,antibiotics dosage,perioperative complications,complications of lying in bed,fracture complications and Harris score were measured.Results There were no significant differences between replacement and control groups with respect to operation time (52.7 minutes vs 52.0 minutes),amount of bleeding (160.9 ml vs 156.5 ml),drainage volume (162.2 ml vs 158.3 ml),Harris score (73.7 points vs 74.2 points),time to extract drainage tub (69.9 hours vs 68.9 hours) (P ＞ 0.05).Both groups had 5 days of preventive antibiotic usage.Better results were observed in replacement group than in control group concerning mean time of ambulation (8.1 days vs 109.3 days),rate of perioperative complications (19％ vs 59％),rate of bed rest complications (0 vs 36％) and rate of internal fixation complications (0 vs 18％) (P ＜ 0.05).Conclusion Cemented bipolar femoral head arthroplasty is effective to prevent the complications of internal fixation,bed rest as well as perioperation and improve the quality of life during the treatment of intertrochanteric fracture in elder patients with heart,lung,brain and other diseases.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:Operative approaches of lumbar interbody fusion include anterior (ALIF),posterior (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).The resected structures and cage implantation sites are different,and the initial stability of lumbar spine is varied.OBJECTIVE:To compare the initial stability of lumbar spine following ALIF,PLIF or TLIF in combination with bilateral pedicle screw fixation.DESIGN:Comparative observation.MATERIALS:Fifteen samples of fresh calf lumbar spine were used.METHODS:Models ofALIE PLIF and TLIF were simulated.After examination as normal group,the samples were randomly divided into three groups (n=5).Besides anterior,posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion include anterior,bilateral pedicle screw fixation was performed.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:Biomechanical characteristics of the lumbar spine before and after ALIF,PLIF or TLIF in combination with bilateral pedicle screw fixation.RESULTS:Following three approaches of lumbar interbody fusion,the stability of lumbar spine was significantly reduced,which was enhanced after bilateral pedicle screw fixation (torsion indexes were also increased).In addition,rigidity of the lumbar spine was enhanced.The stability indexes of lumbar spine following TLIF were significantly greater than the other approaches,indicating the initial stability of TLIF was the best.The rigidity,stress,and swain of lumbar spine following PLIF were greater than ALIE but torsion indexes were smaller than ALIE CONCLUSION:The stability of lumbar spine following lumbar interbody fusion was significantly reduced compared with normal sample.But bilateral pedicle screw fixation greatly increases the stability.Among three types of lumbar interbody fusion,the initial stability of lumbar spine following TLIF is the best.